General Information

The publication process relies on the expertise of peer reviewers. Their assessments are crucial in determining the quality of submissions and ensuring that only those meeting our standards are published. We are deeply thankful for their dedication and the significant time and effort they dedicate. They must adhere to the guidelines.

Scope of the Journal

The journal is a valuable resource for academics, researchers, and professionals who want to stay updated on the latest developments in engineering, non-health applied sciences, and computer science.

Double-Blind

The journal follows a double-masked peer review process in which the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. To ensure fairness, reviewers selected for this process are not affiliated with the same institution or country as the contributing authors.

Conflict of Interest

Conflicts of interest can occur during the review and publication process when a participant has affiliations that could unfairly influence their evaluation, regardless of the actual impact on their decision-making. Reviewers should disclose any conflicts that could bias their manuscript assessment and, if necessary, refrain from evaluating specific manuscripts.

Confidentiality

Reviewers play a crucial role in upholding the integrity of the peer review process by treating the manuscripts they evaluate as confidential documents. They must adhere to strict ethical standards and avoid exploiting unpublished information from these manuscripts for personal gain. Additionally, it is considered unethical and a breach of the journal's policies to share, discuss with colleagues, or distribute the content that has been reviewed. Reviewers should refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers for comprehensive standards, accessible at: (http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines).

Reviewer Responsibilities

Timeliness

We usually ask reviewers to submit their evaluations within two weeks, but extensions are available. If you cannot meet the deadline, please let the editorial office know when you're invited to review. Also, if you cannot conduct the review, we would appreciate it if you could suggest an alternative reviewer with the necessary qualifications.

Manuscript Evaluation

Reviewers play a critical role in evaluating the scientific quality of manuscripts. Their feedback should be clear, logical, and respectful, aimed at facilitating improvements to the manuscript.